Nation Environmental Correspondent Mark Hertsgaard sits down with GRITtv’s Laura Flanders to talk about the environmental movement and the current climate legislation. Flanders is pessimistic that the current bill will actually reduce emissions. Hertsgaard agrees that the loopholes in the bill will make it difficult to actually cap emissions: “Cap and trade could work if you get tough legislation but that is a very big if in the United States of America,” Hertsgaard says.
Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category
Video: Tougher Cap and Trade Legislation (GRITtv, 14mins)
Wednesday, April 21st, 2010Mass alert: wake up!
Thursday, January 21st, 2010I won’t say I predicted it, but I had a hunch that Tuesday’s U.S.
Senate election in Massachusetts might go badly for the Democrats and
the White House.
I happened to spend a few days in western Mass a week before the
election, speaking for the Dowmel Lecture Series about the Copenhagen
climate summit and what comes next. I had taken Amtrak up from New
York City, a beautiful two hour ride along an often-frozen Hudson
river. I was then fetched from the train station and driven an hour
east to the charming town of Stockbridge, in the heart of the
Berkshires, a region known for its glorious summers, ample cultural
offerings and generally liberal politics. As we passed through lovely
rolling hills and farmland, I kept seeing lawn signs with the name
Brown on them. I hadn’t followed the Massachusetts raise close enough
to know, so I asked my companions who Brown was.
“Oh, he’s the Republican running to take over Teddy Kennedy’s old
seat,” the husband replied.
(more…)
Hertsgaard on “Obama’s plan for the environment” (audio)
Sunday, March 1st, 2009Interviewed by Lisa Mullins on PRI’s The World (Feb 26, 2009)
Journalist Mark Hertsgaard writes about the environment for The Nation. So, Mark, when you hear about not only an investment in more efficient energy sources but something also that will put people back to work and make the nation more secure, as the President said, sounds too good to be true. Do you think it is? …
Download the audio file (MP3/2.3MB): http://www.theworld.org/audio/0226092.mp3
Or view the transcript at: http://www.theworld.org/node/24757/
Luke the Plumber
Tuesday, November 4th, 2008Mark Hertsgaard is blogging the 2008 Election day from Chicago for Vanity Fair, The Nation and Italian radio.
Just back to Chicago after a day spent in neighboring Indiana, a battleground state Democrats haven’t won since 1964 but might tonight. In any case, it looks like it will be close. The polls closed in the eastern half of the state an hour ago and will close in the western half in a few minutes. Turnout seems to have been very high across the state, including in the traditionally strongly Republican town of Elkhart, where I was this afternoon and where the Obama campaign mounted a major push.
Elkhart is the RV manufacturing capital of the world and so has been slammed economically in recent years, so the Obama campaign targeted it early as a place where they might pick up votes. The investment seems to have paid off: turnout was up 500% over 2004 in the precincts I visited in southern Elkhart, according to local volunteer Luke Lefever, a plumber who grew up in Elkhart and introduces himself, of course, as Luke the Plumber (and shows you his plumber’s license to prove it). “I’m feeling very good tonight,” said Lefever, who dared say the Democrats might take the state when all the votes are counted. “At the very least, we forced McCain to defend it.”
Culture clash of the day?
Tuesday, November 4th, 2008Mark Hertsgaard is blogging the 2008 Election day from Chicago for Vanity Fair, The Nation and Italian radio.
Kamala Harris, the co-chair of Obama’s campaign in California and as District Attorney of San Francisco one of the first elected officials in the nation to endorse him back when he first announced his candidacy (and nobody gave him much of a chance), came to Chicago for Election Night but spent the day half an hour away in heavily African-American Gary, Indiana, doing legal protection work. When she reached her assigned polling station, she was introduced to one of her Republican counterparts, a local lawyer.
“Where are you from? he asked Harris, who, like Obama, is not only of mixed white-and-African-American heritage but strikingly attractive.
“California,” she replied.
“Whereabouts?” the local Republican asked.
“San Francisco,” said Harris.
“Oh, the land of fruits and nuts, huh?”
Harris, an obvious possibility for a high post in a future Obama administration, smiled and said nothing. When the Republican turned back to his group, she explained, “I’ve learned to save my breath. Some people, you’re never going to change their minds.”
Anxiety and anticipation in Chicago
Tuesday, November 4th, 2008Mark Hertsgaard is blogging the 2008 Election day from Chicago for Vanity Fair, The Nation and Italian radio.
Here in Barak Obama’s hometown of Chicago, there is soaring anticipation, great anxiety and one giant absence on the eve of Election Day 2008. The possibility—at this point, probability—that the hometown hero will be elected president of the United States tomorrow is the number one topic of conversation among locals and visitors alike. “Oh, yeah, everyone’s pretty excited here,” said Tiffany, a heavy-set young African-American woman working the check-out counter at Walgreen’s downtown. “I think he’s going to win. And I think he’ll do a good job as president.”
Inside Obama’s national campaign headquarters on Michigan Avenue on Sunday afternoon, the twenty-somethings who seem to hold all but the very highest jobs in the campaign were carrying in crock pots and grocery bags filled with home-cooked meals—prepared by local supporters to fuel the kids as they turned in yet another 18 hour work day. The national polls point to a solid, perhaps spectacular, Obama victory on Tuesday, but none of the staffers I spoke with admitted to anything but a head-down race to the finish. “Barak told us the other day, ‘Anyone who’s feeling complacent about this election, I have two words for you: New Hampshire,’” said one, referring to the state whose primary election Obama was expected to win back in January but where Hillary Clinton prevailed instead, reviving her candidacy. “Now you hear those two words around here all the time,” the staffer continued. “When it’s two in the morning and you haven’t had a full night’s sleep in weeks and you want to go home, you tell yourself ‘New Hampshire,” and you keep going.”
Although virtually every desk on the 11th floor headquarters was full on Sunday at 5 pm as the campaign prepared last minute internet appeals and phone calling operations, the staffer (who cannot be named because the campaign press office had not approved our conversation) said that the headquarters was actually relatively empty, compared to the past few weeks, when space was so tight that campaign workers were crowding the aisles, sitting on the floor while working their computers. “Anyone who doesn’t have to be in headquarters at this point to do their job has been sent to the field to get out the vote,” said the aide.
Many of the staffers from Chicago have gone to Indiana, a quick thirty minute drive down Interstate 94, where Obama is running neck and neck with McCain in a state that hasn’t voted Democrat in a presidential election since choosing Lyndon Johnson in 1964. Indiana, where I myself will be going on Election Day, is also where the second, post-Civil War incarnation of the Ku Klux Klan was born. If Obama wins Indiana—and he has been campaigning hard there, not just in the traditionally Democratic Chicago suburbs of northwestern Indiana but in rural areas as well—it would signal not just the end of John McCain’s presidential ambitions but a historic shift in the direction of American democracy and perhaps the nation’s soul.
The anxiety one finds here comes in two forms: the first from Democrats who are afraid to jinx the prospect of an Obama victory by getting their hopes up too early; the second, more ominously, from African-Americans who say they are excited at the chance a black man will be elected president but often quickly add their fear that Obama might then be shot, especially if he attends the massive outdoor Election Night party planned in Grant Park, the downtown park beside Lake Michigan where Fourth of July fireworks and other city-wide are commonly held.
“I do worry about that, I do,” said Sylvia Wilson, an African-American college administrator from St. Louis in town for a convention over the weekend who is extending her stay a couple of days to be an eyewitness to history (and perhaps to Obama himself, since she too is staying at the Hyatt, where Obama will watch the returns on Election Night). “I’m old enough to remember the shootings of the 1960s—John F. Kennedy, Medgar, Malcom, Martin. They better have good security for him, that’s all I’ll say.”
And finally the giant absence: Studs Terkel, the author, activist and radio host who symbolized Chicago, died last Friday at the age of ninety-six, reportedly in his sleep. In his best-selling oral histories (Working, Division Street: America and especially Race—Studs introduced America to itself in all of its nuanced, rambunctious diversity; his portrayals of the fundamental decency of ordinary people gave us hope of a better day. “Redemption,” he answered a few years ago, when asked if there was a common theme to his books. “Anybody can be redeemed,” he added. “I’ve seen it.” On Tuesday, America has its shot at redemption. What a shame Studs won’t be here to chronicle it.
Climate Change at the Chicago Humanities Festival
Thursday, November 1st, 2007I’m heading off on Friday to Chicago, where I’ll join Bill McKibben, E. L. Doctorow, Terry Tempest Williams, Diane Ackerman, Lawrence Weschler and dozens of other leading thinkers and scientists at the annual Chicago Humanities Festival. The Festival is a city-wide event of readings, lectures, panel discussions, performances that focus on a different theme each year. This year’s theme is global climate change, under the title, “Climate of Concern.” (Last year’s theme was the war in Iraq.) You can read all about it at the Festival’s website. And if you are in or near Chicago, I invite you to come and join the conversation. I’ll be moderating two panels, both on Saturday, Nov 3.
If Gore were arrested …
Wednesday, October 24th, 2007Fresh from winning the Nobel peace prize for his climate change evangelism, Al Gore is apparently considering an invitation from a prominent environmental group to engage in civil disobedience against the construction of new coal-fired power plants.
Rainforest Action Network issued the invitation to the former U.S. vice president, according to RAN executive director Michael Brune. The San Francisco-based group has a twenty year history of protesting against destructive logging practices and other causes of climate change; it specializes in targeting corporations as much as governments.
“We came across a quote from Gore in an interview with [New York Times] columnist Nicholas Kristoff back in August, saying he didn’t understand, quote, ‘why there aren’t rings of young people blocking bulldozers and preventing them constructing new coal-fired power plants,’” said Brune. “We thought, ‘Great idea!’ That’s the kind of activism we do at RAN. So we decided to invite Gore to join us.”
Gore’s office confirmed that the former vice president had received RAN’s invitation and was considering it, though no decision has been made.
Which Climate Bill on Capitol Hill?
Friday, October 12th, 2007Now that Al Gore and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have won the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize, will the US Congress take the IPCC’s scientific advice on how to fight global warming? The IPCC holds that the world must reduce greenhouse gas emissions at least 80 percent by the year 2050. Few in Congress seem prepared to go that far, however. And judging from the discussion at a closed-door meeting on Capitol Hill last week, even lawmakers who personally embrace the “gold standard” of 80 percent reductions are prepared to endorse a weaker measure in the name of getting some form of climate legislation moving in Congress.
“Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.” So goes one of the oldest sayings in politics, generally invoked by reformers who think that half a loaf of progress is better than none. Often the reformers agree privately with more ambitious colleagues who want the entire loaf, but they argue that pushing too hard and too soon may end up yielding no progress at all.
There are times when this is sound strategic advice. Is the current battle over global warming legislation one of those times?